Journal of Transportation Research

Journal of Transportation Research

Financing the Logistics Flow in Iranian Rail Transport: A Competitive Analysis of Trade Credit versus Inventory Financing

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Professor, Department of Economic, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
2 Ph.D. Student, Department of Economic, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran.
Abstract
Abstract



Given the Iranian economic landscape characterized by severe constraints on working capital, selecting optimal solutions for Supply Chain Finance (SCF) has gained increasing importance, particularly in the railway transport industry, which is inherently capital-intensive and plays a pivotal role in national logistics. This study aims to identify and prioritize the factors influencing the choice between two primary logistics financing approaches: “Trade Credit” (bank facilities) and “Inventory Financing” (asset-based financial services by Third-Party Logistics/TPLs). The research methodology employs an exploratory mixed-methods design comprising qualitative and quantitative phases. In the qualitative phase, 11 key factors were identified through thematic analysis of 15 semi-structured interviews with experts from the banking, railway, and private sectors. Subsequently, in the quantitative phase, these factors were weighted and prioritized using the TOPSIS technique and Shannon Entropy method.

The findings indicated that within the Trade Credit model, “payment delay risk” and the “requirement for bank guarantees” constitute the primary obstacles. Conversely, in the Inventory Financing model, “high commission costs” and “weak corporate financial statements” pose the most significant deterrents. A comparative analysis of the results suggests a strategic trade-off between “risk” and “cost” variables, which significantly influences the decision-making of cargo owners. The derived conceptual model further demonstrates that the selection of a financing channel is a function of the complex interaction among macroeconomic factors, institutional characteristics, and corporate financial capabilities. The findings of this study provide a practical framework for financial decision-makers and policymakers in the railway industry.
Keywords
Subjects

-توکلی دهاقانی، محمدرضا، شادی شاهوردیانی و حجت‌اله موسی‌پور (۱۳۹۶). بررسی رابطه بین مدیریت زنجیره تأمین پایدار با عملکرد زیست‌محیطی و عملکرد مالی.  پژوهشنامه بازرگانی، (۸۵)، ۱۹۴-۱۷۱.
- دهقانی، آرش و ابراهیمی، ابوالفضل و محمدی، سجاد. (۱۴۰۳).  تحلیل موانع توسعه تأمین مالی زنجیره تأمین در ایران با رویکرد مدل‌سازی ساختاری تفسیری. فصلنامه علمی پژوهش‌های نوین در مدیریت و مهندسی صنایع، ۷(۱)، ۱-۱۸.
-سجادی نژاد، اشکان و سهراب عبدالله زاده (۱۳۹۶). ارزیابی تعداد تأمین‌کنندگان در زنجیره تأمین با در نظر گرفتن هزینه نگهداری. کنفرانس ملی پژوهش‌های نوین در مدیریت و حسابداری، ارومیه، ایران.
-سلامتی، محمد (۱۴۰۲). شناسایی و رتبه‌بندی عوامل مؤثر بر موفقیت تأمین مالی زنجیره‌ای برای شرکت‌های کوچک و متوسط. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران.
-فیضی، کامران و فیروزه خاتمی (۱۳۹۸). ارائه یک مدل تأمین مالی برای شرکت‌های کوچک و متوسط در زنجیره تأمین. مدیریت صنعتی، ۱۱(۳)، 462-437.
-مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی (۱۳۹۹)آسیب‌شناسی نظام تأمین مالی بخش حمل‌ونقل ریلی باری و راهکارهای یشنهادی (مطالعه موردی: لکوموتیو). (گزارش شماره ۱۷۵۴۳). تهران: دفتر مطالعات زیربنایی.
-Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
-Chen, X., Cai, G. G., & Song, J. (2019). The cash flow advantages of 3PLs as supply chain orchestrators. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 21(2), 435-451.
-Christopher, M. (2022). Logistics and supply chain management (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
-Diao, X., Ma, W., & Zhao, C. (2021). Optimizing loan-to-value ratios for inventory financing in ports: Effects of risk aversion and decision preference. Maritime Policy & Management, 48(6), 834-850.
-Emtehani, F., Nahavandi, N., & Mokhatab Rafiei, F. (2021). A joint inventory-finance model for coordinating a capital-constrained supply chain with financing limitations. Financial Innovation, 7(6), 1-25.
-Gao, Y., Li, J., & Wang, Y. (2019). An inventory financing model based on blockchain technology. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1237(2), 022097.
-Huang, S., Chen, J., & Lee, L. H. (2019). 3PL as a supply chain orchestrator: The role of contracting and information services. Naval Research Logistics, 66(7), 541-558.
-Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
-Liu, J., Zhang, H., & Zhen, L. (2021). In-transit inventory financing for a capital-constrained
 retailer with a 3PL provider. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 154, 102454.
-Moretto, A., Grassi, L., & Macchion, L. (2021). Supply chain finance innovations: A comprehensive review and research agenda. International Journal of Production Economics, 240, 108250.
-Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187-221.
-Wu, C., Kogan, K., & Goldsman, D. (2018). Managing trade credit: A coordination of operational and financial decisions. Production and Operations Management, 27(8), 1547-1560.
-Yang, Z., & Birge, J. R. (2018). Trade credit, risk, and inventory management. Management Science, 64(8), 3537-3556.
-Zaman, S. I., Khan, S. A., & Kusi-Sarpong, S. (2024). Investigating the relationship between supply chain finance and supply chain collaborative factors. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 31(6), 1941-1975.
-Zheng, X., & Chen, Y. (2024). Does supply-chain-finance help to improve the efficiency of outward foreign direct investment? Finance Research Letters, 59, 104703.
-Zhi, B., Wang, X., & Xu, F. (2020). Impawn rate optimisation in inventory financing: A canonical vine copula-based approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 227, 107673.