Journal of Transportation Research

Journal of Transportation Research

Dynamic Analysis of Traction Constraints and Rail Freight Modal Share in Iran: A System Dynamics Model

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 DPh.D., Student, Department of Economic Development, Faculty of Economics, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Ira
2 Associate Professor, Department of Economic Development and Planning, Faculty of Economics, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Railway Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
Rail freight transport plays an important role in sustainable transport policy because of its higher safety and lower environmental impacts compared with road freight. However, the share of rail in freight transport in Iran has declined in recent years, and the targets set for increasing rail’s modal share have not been achieved. Evidence suggests that supply-side constraints—particularly declining locomotive availability, breakdowns, maintenance limitations, waiting times, and the structure of traction allocation—play an important role in limiting effective capacity. This study applies a system dynamics approach to model the interactions among freight demand, mode choice, rail capacity, and the traction subsystem within an integrated quantitative framework. In the model, realized rail freight share results from the interaction between potential rail freight demand and effective available capacity, while locomotive availability is represented as an endogenous variable determined by utilization, wear, maintenance, and breakdowns. Mode choice is formulated using a logit model based on the relative cost, relative time, and relative accessibility of rail compared with road transport. The model was evaluated through structural validity, dimensional consistency, historical behavior reproduction, and extreme-condition tests. Simulation results indicate that removing stops associated with locomotive changes at regional boundaries can reduce transport time and increase both rail capacity and attractiveness, provided that fleet imbalances and coordination problems are effectively managed. Increasing the locomotive tariff adjustment factor strengthens maintenance resources and improves locomotive availability but, if passed through to final freight rates, also increases the relative cost of rail and reduces potential demand. Increasing the frequency of periodic inspections produces more persistent improvements when supported by adequate maintenance resources. Overall, the findings suggest that a sustained increase in rail freight modal share requires a coordinated package of allocation, maintenance, operational, and pricing reforms, potentially complemented by policies that reduce the relative attractiveness of road freight.
Keywords
Subjects

-جلالیان، سحر (۱۴۰۰). محاسبه قابلیت اطمینان و بررسی و تحلیل سطح آماده‌به‌کاری لکوموتیوهای GM سری بالا، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه صنعت نفت، تهران، ایران.
-شرکت راه آهن جمهوری اسلامی ایران (۱۴۰۵). سالنامه آماری شرکت راه آهن (۱۳۹۷-۱۴۰۴). تهران، ایران.
-وزارت راه و شهرسازی. (۱۳۹۸). مطالعات طرح جامع حمل‌ونقل کشور، فصل هفتم: مدل تفکیک بار. وزارت راه و شهرسازی.
-Abbas, K. A., & Bell, M. G. H. (1994). System dynamics applicability to transportation modeling. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 28(5), 373–390.
-Björk, L., Vierth, I., & Cullinane, K. (2023). Freight modal shift: A means or an objective in achieving lower emission targets? The case of Sweden. Transport Policy, 142, 125–136.
-de Jong, G. (2013). Mode choice models. In L. Tavasszy & G. de Jong (Eds.), Modelling freight transport Elsevier.117–141. doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-410400-6.00006-9
-De Jong, G., Gunn, H. F., & Walker, W. (2004). National and international freight transport models: An overview and ideas for future development. Transport Reviews, 24(1),
103–124.
 doi.org/10.1080/0144164032000080494
-de Jong, G., Schroten, A., Van Essen, H., Otten, M., & Bucci, P. (2010). The price sensitivity of road freight transport: A review of elasticities. In Applied Transport Economics: A Management and Policy Perspective. De Boeck.
-Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. MIT Press.
-Ghisolfi, V., Tavasszy, L. A., Correia, G. H. D., Chaves, G. D. L., & Ribeiro, G. M. (2022). Freight transport decarbonization: A systematic literature review of system dynamics models. Sustainability, 14(6), 3625.
-Holguín-Veras, J., Kalahasthi, L., Campbell, S., González-Calderón, C. A., & Wang, X. (2021). Freight mode choice: Results from a nationwide qualitative and quantitative research effort. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 143, 78–120.
-Nassar, R. F., Ghisolfi, V., Annema, J. A., van Binsbergen, A., & Tavasszy, L. A. (2023). A system dynamics model for analyzing modal shift policies towards decarbonization in freight transportation. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 48, 100966.
  -Pirouzrahi, Z., Vanelslander, T., & Nassiri Aghdam, A. (2025). Applying system dynamics modelling to modal shift: A systematic review. Sustainable Futures, 9, 100526.
-Railway of the Islamic Republic of Iran. (2024). Statistical yearbook of railway transportation (1991–2023). RAI.
-Roland Berger. (2018). New strategy and structure development for railway industry in Islamic Republic of Iran. Islamic Republic of Iran Railways.
-Shepherd, S. P. (2014). A review of system dynamics models applied in transportation. Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics, 2(2), 83–105.
-Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. McGraw-Hill.
-Tamannaei, M., Zarei, H., & Rasti-Barzoki, M. (2021). A game theoretic approach to sustainable freight transportation: Competition between road and intermodal road–rail systems with government intervention. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 153, 272–295.