-Abastante, F., Corrente, S., Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., & Lami, I.M. (2019). A new parsimonious AHP methodology: assigning priorities to many objects by comparing pairwise few reference objects. Expert Systems with Applications, 127, 109–120.
-Abbasi, S., & Choukolaei, H. A. (2023). A systematic review of green supply chain network design literature focusing on carbon policy. Decision Analytics Journal, 6, 100189.
-Abbasi, S., Daneshmand-Mehr, M., & Ghane Kanafi, A. (2021). The sustainable supply chain of CO2 emissions during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 17(4), 83–108.
-Abbasi, S., Daneshmand-Mehr, M., & Ghane Kanafi, A. (2022). Designing Sustainable Recovery Network of End‐of‐Life Product during the COVID‐19 Pandemic: A Real and Applied Case Study. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2022(1), 6967088.
-Abbasi, S., Zahmatkesh, S., Bokhari, A., & Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, M. (2023). Designing a vaccine supply chain network considering environmental aspects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 417, 137935.
-Abdullah, L., & Najib, L. (2014). A new preference scale of intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in multi-criteria decision-making problems. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 26(2), 1039–1049.
-Abdullah, L., & Najib, L. (2016). A new preference scale MCDM method based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and the analytic hierarchy process. Soft Computing, 20, 511–523.
-Ahmed, F., & Kilic, K. (2019). Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: a performance analysis of various algorithms. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 362, 110–128.
-Akram, M., Noreen, U., & Deveci, M. (2024). An outranking method for optimizing anti-aircraft missile systems with 2-tuple linguistic m-polar fuzzy data. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 132, 107923.
-Alamoodi, A. H., Albahri, O. S., Deveci, M., Albahri, A. S., Yussof, S., Dinçer, H., & Sharaf, I. M. (2024). Selection of electric bus models using
2-tuple linguistic T-spherical fuzzy-based
decision-making model. Expert Systems with Applications, 249, 123498.
-Aytekin, A., Korucuk, S., & Görçün, Ö.F. (2024). Determining the factors affecting transportation demand management and selecting the best strategy: a case study. Transport Policy, 146, 150–166.
-Bakhtavar, E., & Lotfian, R. (2017). Applying an integrated fuzzy gray MCDM approach: a case study on mineral processing plant site selection. International Journal of Mining and Geological Engineering, 51(2), 177–183.
-Bolturk, E., & Kahraman, C. (2018). A novel interval-valued neutrosophic AHP with cosine similarity measure. Soft Computing, 22(15),
4941–4958.
-Bouraima, M. B., Ayyildiz, E., Ozcelik, G., Tengecha, N. A., & Stević, Ž. (2024). Alternative prioritization for mitigating urban transportation challenges using a Fermatean fuzzy-based intelligent decision support model. Neural Computing and Applications, 36(13), 7343-7357.
-Bouraima, M.B., Qiu, Y., Stević, Ž., & Simić, V. (2023). Assessment of alternative railway systems for sustainable transportation using an integrated IRNSWARA and IRNCoCoSo model.
Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 86, 101475.
-Brady, M.K., & Cronin Jr., J.J. (2001). Some new thoughts on conceptualizing perceived service quality: a hierarchical approach. Journal of Marketing, 65, 34–49.
-Buckley, J.J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17(3), 233–247.
-Cao, Y., Han, X., Wu, X., Deveci, M., Kadry, S., & Delen, D. (2024). Evaluation of food waste treatment techniques using the complex q-rung orthopair fuzzy generalized TODIM method with weighted power geometric operator. Journal of Environmental Management, 353, 120105.
-Çelikbilek, Y., Moslem, S., & Duleba, S. (2023). A combined grey multi criteria decision making model to evaluate public transportation systems. Evolving Systems, 1-15.
-Cheranchery, M.F., Bhattacharyya, K., Salih, M., & Maitra, B. (2019). A proactive approach to assess safety level of urban bus stops. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 26(3),
260–270.
-Chu, K.F., & Guo, W. (2023). Deep reinforcement learning of passenger behavior in multimodal journey planning with proportional fairness. Neural Computing and Applications, 35(27), 20221–20240.
-Deng, Y., & Yan, Y. (2019). Evaluating Route and Frequency Design of Bus Lines Based on Data Envelopment Analysis with Network Epsilon‐Based Measures. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2019(1), 5024253.
-Deveci, M., Mishra, A. R., Rani, P., Gokasar, I., Isik, M., Delen, D., ... & Daim, T. (2024). Evaluation of intelligent transportation system implementation alternatives in metaverse using a Fermatean fuzzy distance measure-based OCRA model. Information Sciences, 657, 120008.
-Duleba, S., & Moslem, S. (2019). Examining Pareto optimality in analytic hierarchy process on real data: an application in public transport service development. Expert Systems with Applications, 116, 21–30.
-Duleba, S., & Moslem, S. (2021). User satisfaction survey on public transport by a new PAHP-based model. Applied Sciences, 11(21), 10256.
-Edvardsson, B. (1997). Quality in new service development: key concepts and a frame of reference. International Journal of Production Economics, 52(1-2), 31–46.
-Edvardsson, B., Enquist, B. (2009). Values-based Service for Sustainable Business: Lessons from IKEA. Routledge, London, UK.
-Fatima, A., Ashraf, S., & Jana, C. (2024). Approach to multi-attribute decision making based on spherical fuzzy Einstein Z-number aggregation information. Journal of Operations Intelligence, 2(1), 179–201. doi.org/10.31181/jopi21202411.
-Fellesson, M., & Friman, M. (2008). Perceived satisfaction with public transport service in nine European cities. In Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Vol. 47, No. 3.
-Garau, C., Desogus, G., Barabino, B., & Coni, M. (2022). Accessibility and public transport mobility for a smart(er) island: evidence from Sardinia (Italy). Sustainable Cities and Society, 87, 104145.
-Ghorbanzadeh, O., Moslem, S., Blaschke, T., & Duleba, S. (2018). Sustainable urban transport planning considering different stakeholder groups by an interval-AHP decision support model. Sustainability, 11(1), 9.
-Gündoğdu, F.K., Duleba, S., Moslem, S., & Aydın, S. (2021). Evaluating public transport service quality using picture fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and linear assignment model. Applied Soft Computing, 100, 106920.
-Ha, S.T., Ibrahim, W.H.W., Lo, M.C., & Mah, Y.S. (2019). Factors affecting satisfaction and loyalty in public transport using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Transport, 10, 60. doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.L3453.1081219
-Haseli, G., Bonab, S. R., Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, M., Ghoushchi, S. J., & Deveci, M. (2024). Fuzzy ZE-numbers framework in group decision-making using the BCM and CoCoSo to address sustainable urban transportation. Information Sciences, 653, 119809.
-Imam, R. (2014). Measuring public transport satisfaction from user surveys. International Journal of Business Management, 9(6), 106.
-Ingvardson, J.B., Nielsen, O.A., Raveau, S., & Nielsen, B.F. (2018). Passenger arrival and waiting time distributions depend on train service frequency and station characteristics: a smart card data analysis. Transport Research Part C, 90, 292–306.
-Jomnonkwao, S., & Ratanavaraha, V. (2016). Measurement modeling of the perceived service quality of a sightseeing bus service: an application of hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis. Transport Policy, 45, 240–252.
-Kakati, P., Senapati, T., Moslem, S., & Pilla, F. (2024). Fermatean fuzzy Archimedean Heronian Mean-Based Model for estimating sustainable urban transport solutions. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 127, 107349.
-Kenger, Z.D., Kenger, Ö.N., & Özceylan, E. (2023). Analytic hierarchy process for urban transportation: a bibliometric and social network analysis. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 1–20.
-Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., & Antuchevičienė, J. (2022). MCDM approaches for evaluating urban and public transportation systems: a short review of recent studies. Transport, 37(6), 411–425.
-Kınay, A.Ö., & Atılgan, C. (2022). Providing priority degrees for the challenges of cloud-based outsourced software development projects via fuzzy analytic hierarchy process methods. Journal of Emerging Computer Technologies, 2(1), 1–6.
-Kinay, A.Ö., & Tezel, B.T. (2022). Modification of the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process via different ranking methods. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 37(1), 336–364.
-Liu, Z. (2024). A distance measure of Fermatean fuzzy sets based on triangular divergence and its application in medical diagnosis. Journal of Operations Intelligence, 2(1), 167–178. doi.org/10.31181/jopi21202415
-Miao, Q., Welch, E.W., & Sriraj, P.S. (2019). Extreme weather, public transport ridership, and moderating effect of bus stop shelters. Journal of Transport Geography, 74, 125–133.
-Minatour, Y., Bonakdari, H., & Aliakbarkhani, Z.S. (2016). Extension of fuzzy Delphi AHP based on interval-valued fuzzy sets and its application in water resource rating problems. Water Resources Management, 30(9), 3123–3141.
-Mohd, W.R.W., & Abdullah, L. (2017). Pythagorean fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to multi-criteria decision making. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1905, 040020.
-Moslem, S. (2024). A novel parsimonious spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for sustainable urban transport solutions. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 128, 107447.
-Moslem, S., & Çelikbilek, Y. (2020). An integrated grey AHP-MOORA model for ameliorating public transport service quality. European Transport Research Review, 12(1), 1–13.
-Moslem, S., Ghorbanzadeh, O., Blaschke, T., & Duleba, S. (2019). Analyzing stakeholder consensus for a sustainable transport development decision by the fuzzy AHP and interval AHP. Sustainability, 11(12), 3271.
-Moslem, S., Gündoğdu, F. K., Saylam, S., & Pilla, F. (2024). A hybrid decomposed fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for optimizing parcel lockers location in the last-mile delivery landscape. Applied Soft Computing, 154, 111321.
-Moslem, S., Saraji, M. K., Mardani, A., Alkharabsheh, A., Duleba, S., & Esztergár-Kiss, D. (2023b). A systematic review of analytic hierarchy process applications to solve transportation problems: From 2003 to 2022. Ieee Access, 11, 11973-11990.
-Moslem, S., Stević, Ž., Tanackov, I., &Pilla, F. (2023a). Sustainable development solutions of public transportation: an integrated IMFSWARA and Fuzzy Bonferroni operator. Sustainable Cities and Society, 93, 104530.
-Nassereddine, M., & Eskandari, H. (2017).
An integrated MCDM approach to evaluate public transportation systems in Tehran. Transport Research Part Policy and Practice, 106, 427–439. doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.10.013
-Önden, İ., Pamucar, D., Deveci, M., As, Y., Birol, B., & Yıldız, F.S. (2024). Prioritization of transfer centers using GIS and fuzzy Dombi Bonferroni weighted Assessment (DOBAS) model. Expert Systems with Applications, 238, 121827.
-Pamucar, D., Deveci, M., Gokasar, I., Brito-Parada, P. R., & Martínez, L. (2024). Evaluation of process technologies for sustainable mining using interval rough number based heronian and power averaging functions. Knowledge-Based Systems, 289, 111494.
-Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., & Berry, L.L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 41–50.
Pina, V., & Torres, L. (2001). Analysis of the efficiency of local government services delivery: An application to urban public transport. Transport Research Part Policy and Practice, 35(10), 929–944.
-Saaty, T.L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234–281.
-Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 41(11), 1073-1076.
-Schneider, B., & White, S.S. (2004). Service Quality: Research Perspectives. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA.
-Sebhatu, S. P. (2010). Corporate social responsibility for sustainable service dominant logic (Doctoral dissertation, Karlstads universitet).
-Soza-Parra, J., Raveau, S., Muñoz, J.C., & Cats, O. (2019). The underlying effect of public transport reliability on users’ satisfaction. Transport Research Part Policy and Practice, 126, 83–93.
-Sun, S., Fang, D., & Cao, J. (2020). Exploring the asymmetric influences of stop attributes on rider satisfaction with bus stops. Travel Behavior and Society, 19, 162–169.
-Tezel, B., & Kınay, A.Ö. (2023). Performance evaluation of magnitude-based fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (MFAHP) method. Acta Infologica, 7(2), 293–307.
-Too, L., & Earl, G. (2010). Public transport service quality and sustainable development: a community stakeholder perspective. Sustainable Development, 18(1), 51–61.
-Tütüncü, K.A., Gül, N.N., Bölükbaş, U., & Güneri, A.F. (2023). Integer linear programming approach for the personnel shuttles routing problem in Yıldız campus in Istanbul. Journal of Soft Computing and Decision Analytics, 1(1), 303–316.
-Xin, Y.X. (2023). The management model of bike sharing system. Journal of Soft Computing and Decision Analytics, 1(1), 209–218. doi.org/10.31181/jscda1120239
-Yildiz, N., & Kahraman, C. (2019). Evaluation of social sustainable development factors using Buckley’s fuzzy AHP based on Z-numbers. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 770–778.
-Zadeh, L. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.
-Zaidan, A. A., Deveci, M., Alsattar, H. A., Qahtan, S., Shang, W. L., Delen, D., ... & Mohammed, Z. K. (2024). Neutrosophic bipolar fuzzy decision-based approach for developing sustainable circular business model innovation tools. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 189, 109966.
-Zheng, Y., He, Y., Xu, Z., & Pedrycz, W. (2018). Assessment for hierarchical medical policy proposals using hesitant fuzzy linguistic analytic network process. Knowledge-Based Systems, 161, 254–267.
-Zhou, T., Zhang, J., Peng, L., & Zhang, S. (2022). Exploring the determinants of public transport usage and shared mobilities: a case study from Nanchang, China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 87, 104146.
-Zhu, B., & Xu, Z. (2014). Analytic hierarchy
process-hesitant group decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 239(3), 794–801.
