Application of Geographical-Spatial Models in Predicting the Frequency of Road Crash (Case Study: Main Road Network of Hamadan Province)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Azad University, North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.

2 Ph.D., Student, Roads and Transportation Planning, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Qazvin Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.

3 Department of Engineering, Malayer University, Malayer, Iran

10.22034/tri.2021.250276.2815

Abstract

Identifying road segment at risk of accidents offers a special approach to safety professionals to better understand crash patterns and enhance road safety management. Conventional methods for identifying accident hotspots and crash patterns are not strong enough to take into account the spatial properties of crash data in the model. Traffic accidents with a spatial nature tend to be spatially dependent, Spatial models describe the predicted value of the crash pattern in space, which can be due to changes in the remarkable properties of the local environment Reflects crash densities better and provides a more realistic picture of crash distribution. In this study, all the main suburban axes of Hamedan province based on spatial accident data from 2017 to 2019 using kernel density distribution methods, geographical weighted regression, (GWR) geographical weighted Poisson regression(GWPR) have been studied. The results of the models show that the geographically weighted Poisson regression(GWPR) model has better results for predicting crash locations than other models.

Keywords

Main Subjects


-Anderson, T.K. Kernel Density Estimation and K-Means Clustering to Profile Road Accident Hotspots. Accid. Anal. Prev. 41 (3), pp.359–364.
 
-Arvin, R., Kamrani, M., Khattak, A.J., Rios-Torres, J., (2018), “Safety impacts of automated vehicles in mixed traffic. Paper Presented at the Transportation Research Board 97th Annual Meeting”, Washington DC.
 
-Chatterjee, A., Wegmann, F., Fortey, N., Everett, J., (2001), “Incorporating safety and security issues in urban transportation planning. In: A Paper Presented at the 80th Annual TRB Meeting. Washington, D.C.
-Chimba, D,. Musinguzi, A., Kidando, E., 2018. Associating pedestrian crashes with demographic and socioeconomic factors. Case Studies on Transport Policy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.01.006.
 
-Chiou, Y.-C., Jou, R.-C., Yang, C.-H., (2015), “Factors affecting public transportation usage rate: geographically weighted regression”, Transp. Res. Part a Policy Pract. 78, pp.161–177.
 
-Dumbaugh, E., Meyer, M.D., Washington, S., (2004), “Incorporating sate highway safety agencies into safety-Conscious planning process”, In: A Paper Presented at the 83th Annual TRB Meeting. Washington, D.C.
 
-Erdogan, S.; Yilmaz, I.; Baybura, T.; Gullu, M. (2008), “Geographical Information System Aided Traffic Accident Analysis System Case Study: City of Afyonkarahisar, Accid., Anal., Prev. 40 (1), pp.174–181.
 
-Fotheringham, S., Brunsdon, C., Charlton, M., (2002), “Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships”, John Wiley & Sons.
 
-Gomes, M., Cunto, F., Silva, A., (2017), “Geographically weighted negative binomial regression applied to zonal level safety performance models”, Accident Analysis and Prevention 106 (2017), pp. 254–261.
 
-Hadayeghi, A., Shalaby, A., Persaud, B., (2010a), “Development of planning-level transportation safety models using full Bayesian semiparametric additive techniques”, Journal of Transportation Safety and Security 2, pp.45–68.
 
-Hadayeghi, A., Shalaby, A.S., Persaud, B.N., (2010b), “Development of planning level transportation safety tools using geographically weighted poisson regression”, Accid. Anal. Prev. 42 (2), pp.676–688.
-Haining, R., (2003), “Spatial Data Analysis: Theory and Practice; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge”.
 
-Hezaveh, A., Arvin, R., Cherry, C., (2019), “A geographically weighted regression to estimate the comprehensive cost of traffic crashes at a zonal level”, Accident Analysis and Prevention 131, pp.15–24.
 
-Huang, H., Abdel-Aty, M., Darwiche, A., (2010), “County-level crash risk analysis in Florida: bayesian spatial modeling. Transp”, Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board,  pp.27–37.
 
-Li, L.; Zhu, L.; Sui, D., (2007), “A GIS-based Bayesian Approach for Analyzing Spatial–Temporal Patterns of Intra-City Motor Vehicle Crashes”, Accid. Anal, Prev., 15 (4), pp.274–285.
 
-Li, Z., Wang, W., Liu, P., Bigham, J. M., & Ragland, D. R., (2013), “Using Geographically Weighted Poisson Regression for county-level crash modeling in California”, Safety Science, 58, pp.89–97.
 
-Li, Z., Wang, W., Liu, P., Bigham, J., Ragland., D., (2013), “Using Geographically Weighted Poisson Regression for county-level crash modelin in California” Safety Science 58 (2013) pp.89–97.
 
-Liu, J., Khattak, A., Wali, B., (2017), “Do safety performance functions used for predicting crash frequency vary across space?” Applying geographically weighted regressions to account for spatial heterogeneity.
 
-Nakaya, T., Fotheringham, A.S., Brunsdon, C., Charlton, M., (2005), “Geographically weighted poisson regression for disease association mapping”, Stat. Med. 24 (17), pp.2695–2717.
-Nhtsa, (2013), “Traffic Safety Facts Department of Transportation”, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
 
-Nie, K., Wang, Z., Du, Q., Ren, F., Tian, Q., (2015), “A network-constrained integratedmethod for detecting spatial cluster and risk location of traffic crash: a casestudy from Wuhan”, China,Sustainability 7 (3), pp.2662–2677.
 
-Okabe, A., Satoh, T., Sugihara, K., (2009), “A kernel density estimation method fornetworks”, its computational method and a GIS-based tool. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci.23 (1), pp.7–32.
 
-Pirdavani, A., Brijs, T., Bellemans, T., Wets, G., (2013), Spatial analysis of fatal an injury crashes in Flanders, Belgium: Application of geographically weighted regression technique. In: The 92th Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
 
-Pulugurtha, S.S.; Krishnakumar, V.K.; Nambisan, S.S. (2007), “New Methods to Identify and Rank High Pedestrian Crash Zones: An Illustration”, Accid. Anal. Prev., 39 (4), pp.800–811.
 
-Shariat Mohaymany, A., Shahri, M., Mirbagheri, B., (2013), “GIS-based method for detecting high-crash-risk road segments using network kernel density estimation”, ISSN: 1009-5020 (Print) 1993-5153 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tgsi20.
 
-Soroori, A., Mohammadzadeh Moghaddam, A., Salehi, M., (2020), “Modeling spatial nonstationary and overdispersed crash data: Development and comparative analysis of global and geographically weighted regression models applied to macrolevel injury crash data”, ISSN: 1943-9962 (Print) 1943-9970 (Online) Journal homepage, https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/utss20.
 
-Tarko, A.P., (2006), “Calibration of safety prediction models for planning transportation networks”, Transp. Res. Rec., J. Transp. Res. Board 1950 (1), pp.83–91.
 
-Xie, Z., Yan, J., (2008), “Kernel density estimation of traffic accidents in a networkspace Computers”, Environ. Urban Syst. 32 (5), pp.396–406.
 
-Xu, P., Huang, H., (2015), “Modeling crash spatial heterogeneity: random parameter versus geographically weighting”, Accid. Anal. Prev. 75, pp.16–25.
 
-Xu, P., Huang, H., Dong, N., Wong, S., (2017), “Revisiting crash spatial heterogeneity: a Bayesian spatially varying coefficients approach. Accid. Anal.”, Prev. 98, pp.330–337.
 
-Yamada, I.; Rogerson, P. (2003), “An Empirical Comparison of Edge Effect Correction Methods Applied to K-Function Analysis”, Geog. Anal. 35, pp.97–109.
 
-Zhang, Y., Bigham, J., Li, Z., Ragland, D., Chen, X., (2012), “Associations between road network connectivity and pedestrian-bicyclist accidents”, In: The 91th Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
 
-Zwerling, C., Peek-Asa, C., Whitten, P., Choi, S.-W., Sprince, N., Jones, M.P., (2005), “Fatal motor vehicle crashes in rural and urban areas: decomposing rates into contributing factors”, Inj. Prev. 11 (1), pp.24–28.