Kamarkhani,The Impact of Knowledge Management Factors on Technology Development with a Focus on Transit Development Criteria

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D., Grad., Kish International Campus, Tehran University, Kish, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Knowledge & Information Science, Payame Noor University (PNU), Tehran, Iran

3 M.Sc., Student, Faculty of Architecture, Babol Azad University, Babol, Iran

10.22034/tri.2021.250905.2818

Abstract

Abstract: A large number of studies have been devoted to the study of factors affecting knowledge management. However, little is known about the impact of knowledge management factors on technology development. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of knowledge management factors on the development of technologies with a focus on transit development criteria.
The present study is part of the correlation-survey method group. In order to collect data, a standard questionnaire was developed. The statistical population includes a team of experts consisting of each studied section of the transit transportation sector in Iran. The selection of the research sample in the present study is saturated and purposeful. (104 questionnaires were collected). To test the research hypotheses, structural equation modeling was used according to a two-step approach using Smart-PLS version 2 software.
The results of the above hypotheses showed that knowledge management factors (knowledge acquisition, knowledge sharing, knowledge application, knowledge protection) with perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use affect the development of technologies focusing on transit development criteria. In general, the use of new tools can reduce problems in the field of work, including transit.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

-Ahmed, A., Anuar Arshad, M., Mahmood, A., & Akhtar, S. (2017), “Neglecting human resource development in OBOR, a case of the China–Pakistan economic corridor (CPEC)”,
pp. 130-142.
 
-Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W., (1988), “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach”, Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), pp.411-423.
 
-Atkinson-Palombo, C., Kuby, M.J., (2011), “The geography of advanced transit-oriented development in metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona, 2000–2007. J. Transp. Geogr. 19”, pp.189–199.
 
-Al-Emran, M., & Teo, T., (2019), “Do knowledge acquisition and knowledge sharing really affect e-learning adoption?” An empirical study, Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10062-w.
 
-Al-Emran M, Mezhuyev V, Kamaludin A, (2020), “Towards a conceptual model for examining the impact of knowledge management factors on mobile learning acceptance”, Technology in Society, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101247.
 
-Assegaff, S., Hussin, A. R. C., & Dahlan, H. M. (2011), “Perceived benefit of knowledge sharing: Adapting TAM model, In International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems. pp. 1–6.
 
-Davis, F. D., (1989), “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology”, MIS Quarterly, 13(3), pp.319–340.
 
-El Said, G. R., (2015), “Understanding knowledge management system antecedents of performance impact: Extending the task-technology fit model with intention to share knowledge construct”, Future Business Journal, 1(1), pp.75–87.
 
-Garrido-Moreno, A., Lockett, N., & García-Morales, V., (2014), “Paving the way for CRM success: The mediating role of knowledge management and organizational commitment”, Information & Management, 51(8),
pp.1031–1042.
 
-García-Sánchez, E., García-Morales, V. J., & Bolívar-Ramos, M. T., (2017), “The influence of top management support for ICTs on organisational performance through knowledge acquisition, transfer, and utilization”, Review of Managerial Science, 11(1), pp.19–51.
 
-Guthrie, A., Fan, Y., (2016), “Developers’ perspectives on transit-oriented development”, Transp. Policy 51, pp.103–114.
 
-Hassanzadeh, A., Kanaani, F., & Elahi, S. (2012), “A model for measuring e-learning systems success in universities”, Expert Systems with Applications, 39(12), pp.10959–10966.
-Kim, S., (2012), “Factors affecting the use of social software: TAM perspectives”, The Electronic Library, 30(5), pp.690–706.
 
-King, W. R., & He, J., (2006), “A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model”, Information & Management, 43(6), pp.740–755.
 
-Lee, C., Lee, G., & Lin, H., (2007), “The role of organizational capabilities in successful ebusiness implementation”, Business Process Management Journal, 13(5), pp.677–693.
 
-Lee, J. N., (2001), “The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success”, Information & Management, 38(5), pp.323–335.
 
-Lin, H. F., & Lee, G. G., (2005), “Impact of organizational learning and knowledge management factors on ebusiness adoption”, Management Decision, 43(2), pp.171–188.
 
-Lin, H. F., (2013), “The effects of knowledge management capabilities and partnership attributes on the stage-based e-business diffusion”, Internet Research, 23(4),
pp.439–464.
 
-Migdadi, M. M., Abu Zaid, M. K. S., Al-Hujran, O. S., & Aloudat, A. M., (2016), “An empirical assessment of the antecedents of electronic-business implementation and the resulting organizational performance”, Internet Research, 26(3), pp.661–688.
 
-Mohammadi, H., (2015), “Social and individual antecedents of m-learning adoption in Iran”, Computers in Human Behavior, 49, pp.191–207.
-Morgan, D. L., (1998), “Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research”, Qualitative Health Research, 8, pp.362-76.
-Nonaka, I., (1994), “A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation”, Organization Science, 5(1), pp.14–37.
 
-Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H., (1995), “The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese
Companies create the dynamics of innovation”, Oxford University Press.
 
-Searle, G., Darchen, S., Huston, S., (2014), “Positive and negative factors for
Transit-Oriented Development: case studies from Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney”, Urban Policy Res. 32 (4), pp.437–457.
Journal of Transportation Research
Volume 19, Issue 71 - Serial Number 71
January 2022
Pages 107-120

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics