Journal of Transportation Research

Journal of Transportation Research

Examining the relationships between influencing factors and the outcomes arising from public–private collaboration in Iran's highway BOT projects using regression analysis

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 M.Sc., Grad., Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Science and Culture, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Science and Culture, Tehran, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Science and Culture, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
The public sector, for various reasons — including shortages in development budgets — welcomes private-sector investment in projects. One such approach is the Build–Operate–Transfer (BOT) method. Previous models indicate that, in each of these projects, the variables “public/private sector characteristics, joint decision-making, trust, commitment, members’ belief in the benefits of collaboration, and process/structure” act as factors influencing the phenomenon of collaboration; likewise, a desirable level of collaboration gives rise to outcomes such as “efficiency, innovation, satisfaction, benefits, and willingness for future investment”. The aim of this research is to examine the relationships among these variables and to identify the factors with a greater effect on the outcomes of collaboration in Build–Operate–Transfer projects. The research method was survey-based and quantitative; the research instrument was a researcher-made questionnaire; and the analysis was conducted using regression in SPSS. To this end, using documentary and survey methods with a quantitative approach, and after collecting data based on the opinions of experts in this field, the data were analyzed using regression testing and SPSS software. The results of the research showed that the initially proposed model was confirmed, and that the factors affecting collaboration have an effect on the outcomes of collaboration. Among the variables of the influencing factors, “process/structure” was the most important variable affecting the outcomes of collaboration, and it had a particularly significant effect on “benefits” and “willingness for future investment”. Also, the variable “members’ belief in the benefits of collaboration” affected “innovation” and “satisfaction”, and the variable “private-sector characteristics” had an effect on “efficiency”. The coefficients of determination obtained ranged from 7.7% to 32.3%, and focusing on improving “process/structure” had the greatest effect on “benefits” and “willingness for future investment”. The main novelty of the present research is the quantitative examination of these relationships for the first time.
Keywords
Subjects

-Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425-455.
doi.org/10.2307/2667105
 -Arshinder, A., Kanda, A., & Deshmukh, S. (2008). Supply chain coordination: Perspectives, empirical studies and research directions. International Journal of Production Economics, 11(52), 316-335.
doi.org10.1016/j.ijpe.2008,05,08
-Arshinder, K., Kanda, A., & Deshmukh, S. G. A (2019). review on supply chain coordination: Coordination mechanisms, managing uncertainty and research directions. In T. M. Choi & T. Cheng Eds. Supply chain coordination under uncertainty, Springer, 39-82.
doi.org/10,1007,3-9-19257-642-3-978
-Bahinipati, B., Kanda, A., & Deshmukh, S. (2009). Horizontal collaboration in semiconductor manufacturing industry supply chain: An evaluation of collaboration intensity index. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 57(3), 880-895. doi.org/1010.1016/j.cie.2009, 03, 0032009.03.003
-Bamford, J., Gomes-Casseres, B., & Robinson, M. (2004). Envisioning collaboration: Mastering alliance strategies. Jossey-Bass.
-Bourland, K., Powell, S., & Pyke, D.  Exploiting timely demand information to reduce inventories. European Journal of Operational Research, 92(2), 239–253.
doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00136-0
-Brinkerhoff, J. (2002). Assessing and improving partnership relationships and outcomes: A proposed framework. Evaluation and Program Planning, 25(3), 215–231.
 doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7189(02)00017-4
-Carbonara, N., & Pellegrino, R. (2020). The role of public private partnerships in fostering innovation. Construction Management and Economics, 38(2), 140–156.
doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2019.1610184
-Chama, C., & Phiri, L. (2025). Evaluating the effectiveness of public-private partnerships (PPPs) in enhancing construction work: A case study of the Lusaka-Ndola dual carriageway project. East African Finance Journal, 4(3),109–123.
doi.org/10.59413/eafj/v4.i3.7
-Chen, S., & Wu, W. (2010). A systematic procedure to evaluate an automobile manufacturer–distributor partnership. European Journal of Operational Research, 205(3),687–698.
 doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.01.036
-Cousins, P. (2002). A conceptual model for managing long-term interorganizational relationships. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 8(2), 71–82. doi.org/10.1016/S0969-7012(01)00006-5
-Davey, B., Levin, E., Ilie, S., et al. (2009). Integrating health and social care: Implications for joint working and community care outcomes for older people. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(1), 22–34.
doi.org/10.1080/1356182040021734
-Dyer, J. H., Kale, P., & Singh, H. (2001). How to make strategic alliances work. MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(4), 37–43.
-Forrer, J., Kee, J. E., Newcomer, K. E., & Boyer, E. (2010). Public–private partnerships and the public accountability question. Public Administration Review, 70(3), 475–484. doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02161.x
-Garcia-Canal, E., Duarte, C., Criado, J., & Llaneza, A. (2002). Accelerating international expansion through global alliances: A typology of cooperative strategies. Journal of World Business, 37(2), 91–107.
doi.org/10.1016/S1090-9516(02)00069-X
-Hu, Z., Li, Q., Liu, T., Wang, L., & Cheng, Z. (2021). Government equity investment, effective communication and public private partnership (PPP) performance: Evidence from China. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(9), 2811–2827.
 doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-02-2020-0138
-Kashtiban, Y., Sobhiyah, M., Danaeefard, H., & Daneshjafari, D. (2016). Framework of multi-level success at public–private partnership projects. Sharif Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management, 32.1(1.1), 127–138. dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.26764741.1395.321.11.13.6
-Klijn, E., & Teisman, G. (2003). Institutional and strategic barriers to public-private partnership: An analysis of Dutch cases. Public Money and Management, 23(3), 137–146.
doi.org/10.1111/1467-9302.00361
-Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996). What firms do Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science, 7(5), 502–518. doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.5.502
 -Lambert, D. M., Emmelhainz, M. A., & Gardner, J. T. (1996). Developing and implementing supply chain partnerships. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 7(2), 1–18. doi.org/10.1108/09574099610805485
-Liu, Z., Jiao, Y., Li, A., & Liu, X. (2021). Risk assessment of urban rail transit PPP project construction based on Bayesian network. Sustainability, 13(20), Article 11507. doi.org/10.3390/su132011507
-Mattessich, P., & Monsey, B. (1992). Collaboration: What makes it work. A review of research literature on factors influencing successful collaboration. Amherst H. Wilder Foundation (ERIC).
-Parsa, F., Zayandehroodi, M., Nadimi, N., & Rezaeifard, M. (2025). Identifying factors affecting the effectiveness of freeway projects in Iran with a public-private partnership approach: Comparison of structural equation modeling and machine learning methods. Journal of Transportation Research, 22(2), 11–26. doi.org/10.22034/tri.2025.473353.3268
-Piltan, M., & Sowlati, T. (2016). Multi-criteria assessment of partnership components. Expert Systems with Applications, 64, 605–617. doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.08.006
-Powell, W. (1987). Hybrid organizational arrangements: New form or transitional development? California Management Review, 30(1), 67–87. doi.org/10.2307/41165267
Primo, M., & Amundson, S. (2002).An exploratory study of the effects of supplier relationships on new product development outcomes. Journal of Operations Management, 20(1), 33–52.
 doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(01)00080-8
-Rothaermel, F., & Boeker, W. (2008). Old technology meets new technology: Complementarities, similarities, and alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 29(1), 47–77. doi.org/10.1002/smj.634
 -Saxton, T. (1997). The effects of partner and relationship characteristics on alliance outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 40(2), 443–461. doi.org/10.5465/256890
-Shahbazi Razlighi, Y., & Sobhiyah, M. H. (2023). The model of collaboration between the public and the private sectors in BOT projects in Iran (multi-case study). Journal of Transportation Research, 20(4, Serial No. 77, 405–422. doi.org/10.22034/tri.2022.316538.2986
-Shaygan, A., & Zare, A. (2015). A look to the position of B.O.T contracts in the Iranian legal system. International Studies Journal (ISJ), 12(2), 135–151.
-Simatupang, T. M., & Sridharan, R. (2005).The collaboration index: A measure for supply chain collaboration. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 35(1), 44–62.
doi.org/10.1108/09600030510577421
-Sinanovic, E., & Kumaranayake, L. (2006). Sharing the burden of TB/HIV? Costs and financing of public–private partnerships for tuberculosis treatment in South Africa. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 11(9),1466–1474.
doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01686.x
-Sodhi, M., & Son, B. (2009). Supply-chain partnership performance. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 45(6), 937–945.
doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2009.05.004
-Willoughby, C. (2013). How much can public private partnership really do for urban transport in developing countries? Research in Transportation Economics, 40(1), 34–55. doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2012.06.038