بررسی آزمایشگاهی اثر دامنه تغییر مکان دوره‌ای برفشار و نشست پشت کوله پل‌های با دهانه کوچک یکپارچه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش آموخته دکتری، گروه عمران، دانشکده مهندسی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، ایران

2 دانشیار، گروه عمران، دانشکده مهندسی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، ایران

چکیده

یکی از موثرترین عوامل بر روی مقدار فشار و نشست پشت کوله پل های یکپارچه، دامنه تغییر مکان های دوره ای می باشد. در این پژوهش از مدلسازی فیزیکی کوچک مقیاس به منظور بررسی اثر دامنه تغییر مکان دوره ای بر رفتار فشار و نشست در پشت کوله پل های یکپارچه استفاده شده است. مدلسازی فیزیکی در این پژوهش عبارت است از دیواره ای که قادر است به خاک پشت خود تغییر مکان های دوره ای اعمال کند. در طول هر آزمایش تعداد دوره رفت و برگشت تغییر مکان به بالای دیواره اعمال شده و نتایج آن مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. مقادیر بیشینه تنش افقی، مقدار ضریب فشار جانبی بیشینه در دوره های تغییر مکان دیوار و نشست های پشت دیواره در این آزمایش ها مورد تحلیل و بررسی قرار گرفته اند. نتایج آزمایش ها نشان می دهد که با افزایش دامنه تغییر مکان دوره ای، مقادیر فشار و نشست پشت دیوار به شدت افزایش می یابند که نتایج با آیین نامه های مختلف مقایسه شده اند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of cyclic displacement amplitude of integral bridge abutment on backfill soil pressure and settlements

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mehdi Zadehmohamad 1
  • Jafar Bolouri Bazaz 2
1 Ph.D., Grad., Civil Engineering Department, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
2 Ph.D., Grad., Civil Engineering Department, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Expansion joints and sliding bearings in conventional bridges eliminate the forces in deck cause by temperature fluctuation. There are always problems with these bridges during operation. Usually expansion joints and sliding bearings damage due to various reasons and lead to high maintenance costs. Also the seismic stability of abutments in conventional bridges is low during earthquakes and usually lead to large bumps behind abutments. The deck in an integral bridge is integrated with abutments, and expansion joints and sliding bearings eliminated. With elimination of expansion joints and sliding bearings, the associated problems with them will eliminate. But there are also problems with integral abutment bridges. In integral bridges, the expansion and contraction of deck causes many geotechnical problems in backfill soil behind abutments. In summer, when the temperature is high, the expansion of deck moves abutments toward the backfill soil. This relative displacement between abutments and backfill soil results in increasing pressure behind abutments in backfill soil. In winter when the temperature is low, the contraction of deck pulls away the abutments from backfill soil. This relative displacement results in soil settlements behind abutments and causes large bumps in surface. The cyclic moving during expansion and contraction, also leads to growing lateral earth pressure in backfill soil. The amplitude of wall displacement has a great effect on lateral soil coefficient and soil settlements. Three different magnitudes of normalized wall displacements δ/H = 0.2%, 0.6%, 1% selected during this research and evaluated. The results showed that by increasing in normalized wall displacements (δ/H) the settlement and peak lateral soil coefficient (Kpeak) of soil behind the wall meaningfully amplified. Also the results of tests in comparison with some existing manuals for integral bridges showed that the lateral soil coefficient in upper parts of the wall is underestimated by manuals.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Integral Bridge
  • Physical Modeling
  • Cyclic Displacement
  • Displacement Amplitude

مراجع

 Burke JR, M. P. )2009(. Integral and semi-integral bridges, Oxford, UK, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Publication, ISBN: 978-1-444-31637-7.
- Hirakawa, D., Nojiri, M., Aizawa, H., Tatsuoka, F., Sumiyoshi, T. & Uchimura, T. )2007(. Residual earth pressure on a retaining wall with sand backfill subjected to forced cyclic lateral displacements. Soil Stress-Strain Behavior: Measurement, Modeling and Analysis, 865-874.
- Lehane, B. )2011(. Lateral soil stiffness adjacent to deep integral bridge abutments. Géotechnique, 61, 593-603, doi.org.10.1680/geot.9.P.135.
- Li, Y., Cheng, C. & Bao, W. (1997). Expansion joint in highway and bridge. China Communication Press, Beijing, China.
-­Zadehmohamad, M. & Bolouri Bazaz, J. )2017(. Cyclic behaviour of geocell-reinforced backfill behind integral bridge abutment. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1-13.
doi.org. 10.1080/19386362.2017.1364882
-Aktan, H., Attanayake, U. & Ulku, E. )2008(. Combining Link Slab, Deck Sliding over Backwall, and Revising Bearings. Kalamazoo, MI, Western Michigan University
-Bahadori, H., Ahmadi, A. & Ghalandarzadeh, A. )2007(. Effect of silt content on the anisotropic behavior of sand in cyclic loading. 4th International Confrence On Earthquake Engineering, Greece.
-Broms, B. B. & Ingleson, I. (1972). Lateral earth pressure on a bridge abutment. Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Geology, Madrid, Vol. 1, 117-123.
-Card, G. & Carder, D. )1993(. A literature review of the geotechnical aspects of the design of integral bridge abutments. TRL Project Report 52, Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, Berks.
-Civjan, S. A., Kalayci, E., Quinn, B. H., Breña, S. F. & Allen, C. A. )2013(. Observed integral abutment bridge substructure response. Engin. Structures, 56, 1177-1191.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.06.029.
-Dreier, D., Burdet, O. & Muttoni, A. )2011(. Transition slabs of integral abutment bridges. Structural Engineering International, 21, 144-150. doi.org.10.2749/101686611X12994961034174
-Emerson, M. )1976(. Bridge temperatures estimated from the shade temperature. TRRL Report LR696, Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, Berks.
-England, G. & Dunstan, T. Shakedown, (1994).  Solutions for soil containing structures as influenced by cyclic temperatures-integral bridge and biological filter.  Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Structural Engineering.
-England, G. & Tsang, N. (2001). Towards the design of soil loading for integral bridges. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College, London.
-England, G. L., Bush, D. I. & Tsang, N. C. (2000). Integral bridges: a fundamental approach to the time-temperature loading problem, Thomas Telford.
-Horvath, J. S. (2000). Integral-abutment bridges: problems and innovative solutions using EPS geofoam and other geosynthetics. Res. Rpt. No. CE/GE-00-2, Manhattan Coll., Civ. Engr. Dept., Bronx, NY.
-Horvath, J. S. (2004). Integral-abutment bridges: a complex soil-structure interaction challenge. Geotechnical Engineering for Transportation Projects. Proceedings of Geo-Trans, Los Angeles, California, USA, ASCE doi.org.10.1061/40744(154)31.
-Horvath, J. S. (2005). Integral-abutment bridges: geotechnical problems and solutions using geosynthetics and ground improvement. IAJB 2005 - The 2005 FHWA Conference on Integral Abutment and Jointless Bridges. 16-18 March, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
-Krier, D. (2009). Modeling of integral abutment bridges considering soil-structure interaction effects, Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Oklahoma,
-Marx, S. & Seidl, G. (2011). Integral Railway B ridges in Germany. Structural Engin. International, 21, 332-340, doi.org.10.2749/101686611X12994961034534.
-Nilsson A. and Torén K., (2001), Foundation Methods for Small Span Bridges, Thesis: MSc, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.
-Petursson, H. & Kerokoski, O. (2011). Monitoring and analysis of abutment-soil interaction of two integral bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 18, 54-64. doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000314
-Petursson, H., Collin, P., Veljkovic, M. & Andersson, J. (2011). Monitoring of a Swedish integral abutment bridge. Structural Engineering International, 21, 175-180.
doi: 10.2749/101686611 X12994961034291
-Rodriguez, J., Martinez, F. & Marti, J. 2011. Integral bridge for high-speed railway. Structural Engineering International, 21, 297-303. doi:10.2749/ 101686611X13049248219881
-Sandford, T. C. & Elgaaly, M. (1993). Skew effects on backfill pressures at frame bridge abutments. Transportation Research Record, 1415, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1–10.
-Springman, S. M. & Norrish, A. R. 1998. Centrifuge modeling of spread-base integral bridge abutments. Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, 124, 376-388.
-Tatsuoka, F., Hirakawa, D., Nojiri, M., Aizawa, H., Nishikiori, H., Soma, R., Tateyama, M. & Watanabe, K. (2009). A new type of integral bridge comprising geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls. Geosynthetics International, 16, 301-326.
-Timoshenko, S. & GERE, J. (1972). Mechanics of Materials. van Nordstrand Reinhold Company. New York., U.S.A. ISBN-13: 978-1-111-13602-4
-Wallbank, E. (1989). The performance of concrete in bridges. A survey of 200 highway bridges, London: Department of Transport, HMSO.
-Wolde-Tinsae, A. M. & Klinger, J. E. (1987). Integral abutment bridge design and construction. Baltimore, Maryland, USA, Maryland State Highway Administration.
 
پژوهشنامه حمل و نقل
دوره 21، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 78
فروردین 1403
صفحه 181-196

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار