مدلی در راستای بررسی تاثیر عوامل مدیریت دانش بر توسعه فناوری ها با تمرکز بر معیارهای توسعه ترانزیت

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش آموخته دکتری، پردیس بین الملل کیش، دانشگاه تهران، کیش، ایران

2 استادیار، گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

3 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده معماری، دانشگاه آزاد بابل، ایران

10.22034/tri.2021.250905.2818

چکیده

چکیده:
تعداد زیادی از تحقیقات به بررسی عوامل اثرگذار بر مدیریت دانش اختصاص یافته اند. با این وجود، تعداد کمی درباره بررسی اثر عوامل مدیریت دانش بر توسعه فناوری ها شناخته شده هستند. هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی تاثیر عوامل مدیریت دانش بر توسعه فناوری ها با تمرکز بر معیارهای توسعه ترانزیت می باشد. پژوهش حاضر جزء گروه روش همبستگی-پیمایشی محسوب می شود. به منظور گردآوری داده ها، پرسشنامه ای استاندارد تدوین شد. جامعه آماری شامل تیم کارشناسان متشکل از هر بخش مورد مطالعه بخش حمل و نقل ترانزیت در کشور ایران می باشد. انتخاب نمونه تحقیق در پژوهش حاضر از نوع سطح اشباء و هدفمند می باشد (104 پرسشنامه گردآوری شد). برای آزمون فرضیه های پژوهش، از مدل‌یابی معادلات ساختاری، طبق رویکرد دو مرحله‌ای و با استفاده از نرم افزار Smart-PLS استفاده گردید. نتایج بدست آمده از فرضیه های مذکور نشان داد که عوامل مدیریت دانش (اکتساب دانش، اشتراک گذاری دانش، کاربرد دانش، حفاظت از دانش) با معیارهای سودمندی درک شده، سهولت استفاده درک شده بر توسعه فناوری ها با تمرکز بر معیارهای توسعه ترانزیت تاثیر گذار است. به طور کلی استفاده از ابزارهای جدید می تواند باعث کاهش مشکلات در زمینه های کاری اعم از تراتزیت گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Kamarkhani,The Impact of Knowledge Management Factors on Technology Development with a Focus on Transit Development Criteria

نویسندگان [English]

  • Habib Kamarkhani 1
  • Majid Shirzad 2
  • Seyed Alireza Rasuli 3
1 Ph.D., Grad., Kish International Campus, Tehran University, Kish, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Knowledge & Information Science, Payame Noor University (PNU), Tehran, Iran
3 M.Sc., Student, Faculty of Architecture, Babol Azad University, Babol, Iran
چکیده [English]

Abstract: A large number of studies have been devoted to the study of factors affecting knowledge management. However, little is known about the impact of knowledge management factors on technology development. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of knowledge management factors on the development of technologies with a focus on transit development criteria.
The present study is part of the correlation-survey method group. In order to collect data, a standard questionnaire was developed. The statistical population includes a team of experts consisting of each studied section of the transit transportation sector in Iran. The selection of the research sample in the present study is saturated and purposeful. (104 questionnaires were collected). To test the research hypotheses, structural equation modeling was used according to a two-step approach using Smart-PLS version 2 software.
The results of the above hypotheses showed that knowledge management factors (knowledge acquisition, knowledge sharing, knowledge application, knowledge protection) with perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use affect the development of technologies focusing on transit development criteria. In general, the use of new tools can reduce problems in the field of work, including transit.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Technology Development
  • Transit Development
  • Technology Acceptance Model
  • Knowledge Management
-Ahmed, A., Anuar Arshad, M., Mahmood, A., & Akhtar, S. (2017), “Neglecting human resource development in OBOR, a case of the China–Pakistan economic corridor (CPEC)”,
pp. 130-142.
 
-Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W., (1988), “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach”, Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), pp.411-423.
 
-Atkinson-Palombo, C., Kuby, M.J., (2011), “The geography of advanced transit-oriented development in metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona, 2000–2007. J. Transp. Geogr. 19”, pp.189–199.
 
-Al-Emran, M., & Teo, T., (2019), “Do knowledge acquisition and knowledge sharing really affect e-learning adoption?” An empirical study, Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10062-w.
 
-Al-Emran M, Mezhuyev V, Kamaludin A, (2020), “Towards a conceptual model for examining the impact of knowledge management factors on mobile learning acceptance”, Technology in Society, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101247.
 
-Assegaff, S., Hussin, A. R. C., & Dahlan, H. M. (2011), “Perceived benefit of knowledge sharing: Adapting TAM model, In International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems. pp. 1–6.
 
-Davis, F. D., (1989), “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology”, MIS Quarterly, 13(3), pp.319–340.
 
-El Said, G. R., (2015), “Understanding knowledge management system antecedents of performance impact: Extending the task-technology fit model with intention to share knowledge construct”, Future Business Journal, 1(1), pp.75–87.
 
-Garrido-Moreno, A., Lockett, N., & García-Morales, V., (2014), “Paving the way for CRM success: The mediating role of knowledge management and organizational commitment”, Information & Management, 51(8),
pp.1031–1042.
 
-García-Sánchez, E., García-Morales, V. J., & Bolívar-Ramos, M. T., (2017), “The influence of top management support for ICTs on organisational performance through knowledge acquisition, transfer, and utilization”, Review of Managerial Science, 11(1), pp.19–51.
 
-Guthrie, A., Fan, Y., (2016), “Developers’ perspectives on transit-oriented development”, Transp. Policy 51, pp.103–114.
 
-Hassanzadeh, A., Kanaani, F., & Elahi, S. (2012), “A model for measuring e-learning systems success in universities”, Expert Systems with Applications, 39(12), pp.10959–10966.
-Kim, S., (2012), “Factors affecting the use of social software: TAM perspectives”, The Electronic Library, 30(5), pp.690–706.
 
-King, W. R., & He, J., (2006), “A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model”, Information & Management, 43(6), pp.740–755.
 
-Lee, C., Lee, G., & Lin, H., (2007), “The role of organizational capabilities in successful ebusiness implementation”, Business Process Management Journal, 13(5), pp.677–693.
 
-Lee, J. N., (2001), “The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success”, Information & Management, 38(5), pp.323–335.
 
-Lin, H. F., & Lee, G. G., (2005), “Impact of organizational learning and knowledge management factors on ebusiness adoption”, Management Decision, 43(2), pp.171–188.
 
-Lin, H. F., (2013), “The effects of knowledge management capabilities and partnership attributes on the stage-based e-business diffusion”, Internet Research, 23(4),
pp.439–464.
 
-Migdadi, M. M., Abu Zaid, M. K. S., Al-Hujran, O. S., & Aloudat, A. M., (2016), “An empirical assessment of the antecedents of electronic-business implementation and the resulting organizational performance”, Internet Research, 26(3), pp.661–688.
 
-Mohammadi, H., (2015), “Social and individual antecedents of m-learning adoption in Iran”, Computers in Human Behavior, 49, pp.191–207.
-Morgan, D. L., (1998), “Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research”, Qualitative Health Research, 8, pp.362-76.
-Nonaka, I., (1994), “A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation”, Organization Science, 5(1), pp.14–37.
 
-Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H., (1995), “The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese
Companies create the dynamics of innovation”, Oxford University Press.
 
-Searle, G., Darchen, S., Huston, S., (2014), “Positive and negative factors for
Transit-Oriented Development: case studies from Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney”, Urban Policy Res. 32 (4), pp.437–457.