-Abbaszadegan. M. (2002). The method of space arrangement in the process of urban design. Urban and Rural Management. No. 9. 67-75. (in Persian)
-Batty. M. (2001). Exploring isovists fields: Space and shape in architectural urban morphology. Environ. Plan. B 2001. No. 28. 123–150.
- Bavar C. (2010). A look at the emergence of new architecture in Iran. Tehran, Faza. (in Persian)
- Bendjedidi. S. Bada. Y. Meziani. R. (2019). Urban plaza design process using space syntax analysis: El-Houria plaza, Biskra, Algeria. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development. 7. 125-142. 10.14246/irspsda.7.2_125
-Benedikt. M.L. (1979). To Take Hold of Space: Isovists and Isovists Fields. Environment and Planning. B: Planning and Design. No. 6. 47–66.
- Bentley I. (1985). Responsive environments: a manual for designers. London: Architectural Press.
- Biniaz. F. Hanaei. T. (2017). Recognition of elements affecting readability in the perception of adults, case study: Emamieh Blvd., Mashhad. Urban Studies Quarterly. Vol. 6. No. 23. 17-28. (in Persian)
- Chen. Y.J. Matsuoka. R.H. Tsai. K.C. (2015). Spatial measurement of mobility barriers improving the environment of community-dwelling older adults in Taiwan. J. Aging Phys. Act. No. 23. 286–297.
-Cutini V. (2016). Motorways in metropolitan areas: the northwestern growth of Florence and the urban use of motorway A1. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Information 5.
-Didehban. M. Pourdeyhimi. Sh. Rismanchian. O. (2013). Relationships between cognitive features and spatial configuration of the artificial environment, an experience in Dezful. Iranian Architectural Studies. Vol. 1. No. 4, 37-64. (in Persian)
-Dursum P. (2007). Space syntax in architectural design. Proceedings Space Syntax. 6th International Space Syntax Symposium, Istanbul.
-Edgü. E. Taluğ, M. Özgece. N. (2015). Divided shopping: a syntactic approach to consumer behavior. A/Z ITU J. Faculty Architect. No. 12. 175–188.
-Eraydin, Z. (2007). Building a legible city: how far planning is successful in Ankara. a thesis submitted for degree of master of science, urban design, city and regional planning of middle east technical university.
- Haghlasan. M. Irani. M. Niknam. S. (2019). Studying the evolution of the spatial structure of traditional Iranian houses from the physical dimension and its relationship with the space syntax method (case example: houses of the Qajar period and Pahlavi of Tabriz). Housing and Village Environment. Vol. 39. No. 172. 17-32. (in Persian)
- Herzog T. Leverich O. (2003). Searching for Legibility. Environmental and Behavior.
- Hillier B. Hanson J. (1984). The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
-Hunt M. (1984). Environmental Learnin without being there. Environmental and Behavior.
-Jumpei. Ueno. (2009). An analysis of pedestrian movement in multilevel complex by space syntax theory-in the case of Shibuya Station. 7th International Space Syntax Symposium.
-Kamalipour. H. Memarian. Gh. Feizi. M. Mousavian, M F. (2012). Formal composition and spatial configuration in native housing: a comparative comparison of guest space layout in traditional houses of Kerman. Housing and Village Environment Journal. Vol. 31. No. 138. 16-3. (in Persian)
- Kiliç-Çalgici. P. Czerkauer-Yamu. C. Çil. E. (2013). Faculty office buildings as work environments: Spatial configuration, social interaction, collaboration and sense of community. A/Z ITU J. Faculty Architect.
No. 10. 178–197.
-Koseoglu. E. Erinsel Onder. D. (2001). Subjective and Objective Dimensions of Spatial Legibility. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. No. 30. 1191-1195.
- Koseoglu. E. Onder. DE. (2011). Subjective and objective dimensions of spatial legibility. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. No. 30. 1191-1195.
-Lang J. (2004). Creation of architectural theory: the role of behavioral sciences in environmental design. Translated by: Alireza Einifar. Tehran: Tehran University Press. (in Persian)
- Lerman. Y. Rofè. Y. Omer. I. (2014). Using space syntax to model pedestrian movement in urban transportation planning. Geogr. Anal. No. 46. 392–410.
- Li. L. Ren. H. Zhao. S. Duan. Z. Zhang. Y. Zhang. A. (2017). Two dimensional accessibility analyses of metro stations in Xi’an, China. Transportation Research Part A. Policy and Practice. No. 106. 414-426.
-Lynch K. (1997). The good theory of the city. Translators Hossein Bahreini and Behnaz Aminzadeh. Tehran: Tehran University Press. (in Persian)
- Mahdzar. Sh. Safari. H. (2014). Legibility as Result of Geometry Space: Analyzing and Comparing Hypothetical Model and Existing Space by Space. Journal of Life Science. Vol. 8.
- Memarian. Gh. (2002). Architectural space arrangement. Soffe. Vol. 12. No. 35. 74-84. (in Persian)
-Memarian. M. Zamani. B. (2018). Developing an urban design framework for Qom city center with the approach of increasing readability and imaginability. Arman Shahr. Vol. 11. No. 25. 301-317.(in Persian)
-Morales. J. Flacke. J. Morales. J. Zevenbergen. J. (2019). Mapping Urban Accessibility in Data Scarce Contexts Using Space Syntax and Location-Based Methods. Appl. Spatial Analysis. No. 12. 205–228. doi: 10.1007/s12061-017-9239-1
- Nemati. H. Momeni. K. Yeganeh. M. (2022). Analyzing the relationship between spatial structure and readability in office buildings using the method of space arrangement, case study: office building of the fourth decade after the revolution. Arman Shahr. Vol. 15. No. 38. 135-150. (in Persian)
-Oftadeh J. (2016). Social network analysis (along with the training of Nodaixal and Gefi network analysis software). Tehran, Sanieh. (in Persian)
-Okhovat. H. (2014). Identifying the components affecting the legibility of the route in commercial complexes with an emphasis on the structure of the traditional market. The 3rd International Congress on Civil Engineering. Architecture and Urban Development. (in Persian)
-O'Neill M. (1991). Evaluation of a conceptual model of architectural Legibility. Environmental and Behavior.
-Paul. A. (2011). An integrated approach to modeling vehicular movement networks. Traffic Eng. No. 52. 416–420.
-Paul. A. (2012). Land-use-accessibility model: a theoretical approach to capturing land-use influence on vehicular flows through configurational measures of spatial networks. Int. J. Urban Sci. No. 16. 225–241.
-Paydar. M. Said. I. (2012). Commuters Perception of Legibility and Complexity with Respect to Path Choice in Central Business District of Kuala Lumpur. International Transaction Journal of Engineering Management. Vol. 3.
-Penn A. (2003). Space syntax and spatial cognition. Environment and Behavior.
- Penn A. Turner A. (2003). Space syntax based agent simulation. London: Bartlett school of graduate studies.
- Rybarczyk. G. Wu. C. (2014). Examining the impact of urban morphology on bicycle mode choice. Envir. Planning B. No. 41. 272–288.
- Safari. H. FakouriMoridani. F. Sharifah. SM. (2016). Influence of geometry on legibility: An explanatory design study of visitors at the Kuala Lumpur City Center. Frontiers of Architectural Research. Vol. 5. 499-507.
- Shatu. F. Yigitcanlar. T. Bunker. J. (2019). Objective vs. subjective measures of street environments in pedestrian route choice behaviour: Discrepancy and correlates of non-concordance. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 126. 1-23.10.1016/j.tra.2019.05.011.
-Shokouhi. M. (2003). Legible cities: The role of visual clues and pathway configuration in legibility of cities. Proceedings of the 4th International Space Syntax Symposium London.
-Soltani. S. Khaki. A. (2014). Investigating legibility in the work space using the analytical method of space layout. Case example: office building in the pre-construction phase. National conference of new theories in architecture and urban planning. (in Persian)
- Tarquzzaman. M. Nilufar. F. (2022). Urban Grid and Accessibility of Proposed Metro Stations in an Organic City: Using Space Syntax as an Analytical Tool. Proceedings of the 13th Space Syntax Symposium.
Taylor. N. (2009). Legibility and aesthetics in urban design. Journal of Urban Design. Vol. 14. No. 2. 189–202.
-Turner. A. (2001). Angular Analysis. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Space Syntax Symposium, Atlanta, GA, USA, 7–11 May 2001.
-Uyar G. Güven A. Karimi K. Parham E. Acharya A. (2017). Using an analytical process to contextualise architectural prototypes for metro stations.
- Van Nes A. Yamu C. (2021). Introduction to Space Syntax in Urban Studies. 10.1007/978-3-030-59140-3.
-Van der Hoeven. F. van Nes. A. (2014). Improving the design of urban underground space in metro stations using the space syntax methodology. J. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. No. 4064–74.
-Xu. Y. J. Bai. X. Chu. K. F. (2016). Underground space in metro area: constituent, influencing factors and improving strategies of the spatial vitality. 17th World Conference ACUUS 2020 Helsinki. IOP Conf. Series, Earth and Environmental Science 703 (2021) 012016. IOP Publishing.doi:10.1088/1755-1315/703/1/012016.
- Yamu. C. van Nes. A. Garau. C. (2021). Bill Hillier’s Legacy: Space Syntax—A Synopsis of Basic Concepts, Measures, and Empirical Application. Sustainability. Vol. 13. No. 6. 3394.doi.org/10.3390/su13063394
-Young k. Chung J. Kong E. Shin H. Heo J. (2015). A study on the design methodologies for activating.
-Zheng W. Du N. Wang X. (2021). Understanding the City transport System of Urban Agglomeration through Improved Space Syntax Analysis.
International Regional Science Review. Article reuse guidelines:
http://sagepub.com/journals-permissions. doi: 10.1177/01600176211023879.
)